Source code is structured and easy to validate. How can you validate meeting notes and test commercial analysis?
During my recent workshop, I found that Project Managers were more interested in AI agents than the Developers in the room.
The reason became obvious: with a little help, PMs can improve their effectiveness in several distinct areas.
The problem
Software development is relatively easy to automate, but project management is more versatile and requires a different approach.
Project Managers work with mostly unstructured and fragmented data:
- meeting notes
- mockups
- status updates
- strategy guidelines
To address this challenge, I started to work on the following Project Discovery Workflow.
The workflow
Legend: ๐ค agent-driven ยท ๐ค human-driven
| # | Step | Owner | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meeting ingestion | ๐ค | Transcript with speaker and timestamp references |
| 2 | Meeting intelligence | ๐ค | Summary, requirements candidates, decisions, actions, open questions, contradictions |
| 3 | Knowledge reconciliation | ๐ค | Proposed additions and updates |
| 4 | PM review | ๐ค | Approved project knowledge base |
| 5 | Requirements update | ๐ค | Traceable specification |
| 6 | Commercial analysis | ๐ค | Scope assumptions, dependencies, risks, pricing inputs |
| 7 | Proposal generation | ๐ค | Proposal assembled from validated context |
| 8 | PM approval and publication | ๐ค | Approved artifacts sent to the customer |
Notes:
-
Meeting ingestion ๐ค
Import transcript, audio, or meeting notes. Run transcription/diarization only when needed; preserve speaker and timestamp references.
-
Meeting intelligence ๐ค
Extract summary, requirements candidates, promises, decisions, actions, unresolved questions, and contradictions.
-
Knowledge reconciliation ๐ค
Compare extracted findings against existing project facts and prepare a set of proposed additions or updates.
-
PM review ๐ค
Human approves, edits, or rejects important changes to the project knowledge base.
-
Requirements update ๐ค
Requirements Agent produces a traceable specification using approved context and the requirements template.
-
Commercial analysis ๐ค
Commercial Agent identifies scope assumptions, dependencies, risks, pricing inputs, and potential exclusions.
-
Proposal generation ๐ค
Document Agent assembles the proposal from validated project context and version-controlled templates.
-
PM approval and publication ๐ค
Review final artifacts, approve them, and optionally export or send them to the customer.
Two steps out of eight
Two of eight steps are human. That’s deliberate - agents ๐ค draft, people ๐ค decide.
CTA
๐ PMs - which of these steps would you trust an agent with today, and which would you never hand over? Genuinely curious where the line is.
